Tne risk of implementing a new technology in a mobile phones company
In the 1940s mobile phone technology underwent several changes which provided improved services to the people and revolutionized communication due to the concept of mobility in communications , which has enabled the users to talk and listen even while traveling or on the move . At present more than 50 of the people are connected through cellular phones
In the year 1940 the radiotelephone service was launched in the US in to connect the users in cars by connecting to a public fixed network . In the 1960s Bell Systems introduced the IMTS [banner_entry_middle]
or Improved Mobile Telephone Service , which offered higher bandwidth and direct dialing this was the basis for the analog systems developed in 1970s The coverage areas were split into smaller areas called `cells empowered by a low power transreceiver . Then came the First Generation or 1G communication on analog system with the development of microprocessors and the control linkage was digitized between the transmitter and the mobile phone . The Second generation or 2G digitized cellular systems started in 1980 . The digitization , which included the control link as well as the voice signal helped to provide better quality reception at lower costs . In to meet the need for voice fax and the Internet on the cell phones with global roaming , the ITU ‘s IMT- 2000 global standard for 3G or Third generation technology was implemented , it includes multimedia entertainment , infotainment and location based services
Implementing 3G technology poses many hurdles in terms of the services provided , the standard to be adopted in reaching 3G , the time factor and the cost effectiveness . An examination of the results of the 2G technology in general and that of the GSM technology in particular is imperative before implementing of the 3G technology . The success of GSM in the mobile field is attributable to the evolution of the 2G systems
The 3G system is developed from the outcomes of the 2G systems or because the operators deploying them must influence pre-established 2G infrastructure or customer bases . These two factors are interlinked so examining one implies looking at the successes or weaknesses of the other
European telecom markets were controlled by national governments prior to the globalization of markets in the 1990s . Since then European telecommunications policy had been characterized by principles of market liberalization , harmonization of conditions of the regulatory framework and the promotion of the European telecommunication industry . The GSM was a product of this background . It is the leading 2G system having pan-European coverage and systems are also installed in Asia , Australia North America and South America . The European national companies have standardized the system of GSM and the working process is a great success . The companies then realized , first the advantages of the cross-boarder standard and second , the amount of money and energy that would be wasted in its absence when competing for mobile technology world domination . The course of digital technology and its commercial applications influences the establishment of GSM . In other words control over network evolution translates into… [banner_entry_footer]
Author: Essay RaptorThis author has published 9190 articles so far. More info about the author is coming soon.